First impression: Doctor Who Nemesis

In Doctor Who: Nemesis, players take on the roles of iconic villains from Doctor Who and attempt to win by succeeding at their nefarious schemes before the other players do. Each villain has their own unique victory condition, and while the game is primarily a race to complete a particular combination of plays first, players can also interfere with the other players by playing hero cards designed to slow them down.

It is primarily a card game, with a small board worker placement element. Each player has their own board with four spaces representing different combinations of actions, mainly drawing and/or playing different types of cards, and a worker pawn that must move to a different space each turn. A lot of the game's decision points rest with which space to move to that will allow the player to play the type of cards they need to play that turn.

From the above description, Doctor Who: Nemesis sounds exactly like the Villainous series of games, which comes in Marvel, Star Wars, and classic Disney flavors. So exactly that it seems lucky for the designers of Doctor Who: Nemesis that the common wisdom is that it isn't possible to copyright game mechanisms. At the very least, comparisons between the games are inevitable.

I will concede that the games are extremely similar (with the caveat that I have only played Star Wars Villainous). The overall game structure is identical, but the card play in Doctor Who: Nemesis is quite different -- it reminds me a lot more of classic collectible card games from the 1990s, specifically Decipher's Star Wars and Star Trek CCGs. Cards in the game represent characters, permanent conditions, and temporary advantages. Character cards play to specific locations, and can be used to block your opponents' ability to use the actions on their board effectively, resulting in battles where the value of each player's characters at a location are totaled and compared, with the loser losing their forces but the winner having had to spend time fighting off the invaders instead of working on the scheme they need to play out in order to win. It adds a lot of player interaction that's missing from Villainous, and makes the game seem a lot less like double solitaire.

Where Doctor Who: Nemesis really improves on Villainous is in how the forces of good are included in the game. In Villainous, each character has a separate deck of hero cards that can be drawn and played by opponents in order to slow down that player. It works, but it's a little disjointed, and doesn't allow for any real strategy as you're drawing two cards, immediately playing one, and discarding the other. In Doctor Who: Nemesis, each player is given two randomly chosen Doctors at the start of the game; each of those Doctors comes with 4 cards that are shuffled in to that player's deck. The Doctor cards can be used to slow down the opponent by blocking their action spaces, and some of them offer alternate victory conditions that either player can work towards. It's a much more elegant solution and works well with the game's theme: it's easy to imagine Daleks and Cybermen competing for universal dominance, only to have the Doctor come along and foil everyone's plans.

The game was fairly easy to learn, with a surprisingly well-organized rule book and consistent graphics and reminders on the cards and boards. The only thing we found a little awkward was the turn structure. On your turn, you choose your action space, then play & move your characters and resolve battles, then do the actions on the space you've chosen. We found it to be a little counterintuitive to choose an action, then do something unrelated before resolving that action.

Rating: 4 (out of 5) All in all we enjoyed the game quite a bit. Yes, it borrows a lot from Villainous, but we thought it was a more interesting game.

• Doctor Who: Nemesis official website
• Doctor Who: Nemesis on BoardGameGeek

Star Wars the Deckbuilding Game: good enough for now

I love deck building games. These card games that usually involve each player starting with a basic deck of cards that they use to purchase newer, better cards towards an eventual goal of defeating a villain (or the other players) or just accumulating victory points. The format gives me a lot of what I like about trading card games, but without the massive investment of time, energy and money, and has become so ubiquitous as a game mechanism that it has become just one of many design elements in recent (and immensely popular) board games such as Dune: Imperium, and Lost Ruins of Arnak.

Like most people who were children in the 1970s, I love Star Wars. Although the franchise has seen its share of ups and downs over the years, I have enough nostalgic affection for it that I'm prepared to forgive its occasional excesses, and I think its current owners have started to figure out what works and what doesn't, and it's still pretty spectacular when they get it right.

So imagine my relief when Star Wars: the Deckbuilding Game turned out to be a pretty good, if not fantastic, game.

The game's theme has invited a lot of comparisons to Star Realms, but honestly both games borrow their core mechanisms from games like Legendary: cards generate one or more different currencies (in this case, resources, attack, or Force) which are then used to attack your opponent or purchase from a center row of available cards. The game adds two new elements to the deck building game formula: a tug-of-war Force track, and the ability to attack unpurchased cards in the center row.

The Force track is a simple board with several spaces and a marker. When players play cards that generate Force, the marker moves towards their side of the board, and their turn starts with it all the way at their end, they get an extra resource to spend. There are also a handful of cards that have additional abilities if the marker is on one side of the board or the other. It's a game element that's not all that developed, but given the absence of major force-wielding characters like Yoda or Obi-Wan Kenobi from the game, I suspect this will be further developed in an expansion.

Normally in deck building games, players purchase new cards from a common pool or row of available cards, but how do you address that in a world as unambiguously black-and-white as Star Wars? It doesn't really work to have Han Solo working with a squad of stormtroopers, or Princess Leia and Grand Moff Tarkin suddenly resolving their differences and teaming up. The game solves this problem by having all the cards marked as Empire, Rebellion, or neutral. Anyone can buy neutral cards, but rather than the Rebel player being able to buy Imperial cards, or having them just sit there in the row taking up space, each player can attack their opponent's cards, giving them a short term reward and freeing up space for (hopefully) one of their own cards to become available.

The ultimate goal of the game is to destroy your opponent's bases, anywhere between 3 and 5 depending on the desired length of game. Different bases have different in-game abilities, and players can defend their bases by putting capital ships into play -- these horizontally formatted cards stay in play from turn to turn (unusual for a game of this type) and soak up damage directed at their players' bases along with supplying other resources and abilities.

Thematically the game sticks to content from the original Star Wars trilogy and Rogue One, which is set at the same time. In addition to the aforementioned Force-users, the franchise's droid characters such as R2-D2, C-3PO and K2-SO are missing from the game, which makes me think they've been held back for a possible expansion that would introduce additional mechanisms, which would be a good idea -- while the game is perfectly entertaining and playable as-is, it is a little on the simple side and could eventually benefit from some added content to keep players interested.

Rating: 3 (out of 5) A game that is perfectly entertaining, especially if you're a Star Wars fan, but lacking the depth of more involved deck building games like Legendary.

• Star Wars: the Deckbuilding Game official website
• Star Wars: the Deckbuilding Game on BoardGameGeek

Ark Nova: the race to build a better zoo

Ark Nova is an extremely well-designed game that elegantly combines several different game mechanisms and successfully straddles the line between being complex and being just complicated. The zookeeping theme stresses the importance of balancing research and conservation with commercial appeal, and the game has the potential to be a great gateway game à la Settlers of Catan or Pandemic...except that it's saddled with a somewhat high price tag and an overwritten, poorly organized rule book, making the game a little difficult to learn for all but the most experienced tabletop gamers. But it's an excellent game otherwise, well worth it if you can make it through your first few games.

The core mechanism is relatively straightforward. You have a row of 5 cards in front of you, each occupying a space numbered one through 5 and representing an action you can take in the game: build structures such as animal enclosures or kiosks, play animal cards from your hand, use worker placement to claim partnerships with zoos and universities or contribute to conservation efforts, play sponsor cards for immediate or ongoing benefits, or draw cards from the deck. The position of the action card in the row determines how effective it is, and once you've used an action it moves back to the "1" position, causing all the other action cards to move up one spot. Right away you have a wealth of meaningful, strategic choices to make: do you take the lesser action now, or wait until its card has moved and you'll get more out of it? If you need an action to move up in the row, you need to play the actions that are in front of it, even if they don't benefit you right now. The interplay of the different actions and positions is fascinating.

Along the way, certain actions will cause a charming little coffee cup marker to move along what is called the break track. When it gets to the end, an end of round reset occurs, where players retrieve their spent workers, gain income from their zoo's appeal value,  refill their hands of cards, and reset the row of available cards to draw. A key part of the game is the attempt to control when this happens, or at the very least to position yourself so that you're ready to take advantage when it does.

The point of building enclosures, placing animals, supporting conservation efforts, and soliciting sponsors is, of course, to earn the victory points you need to win the game. Players need to make progress along three tracks: appeal, conservation, and reputation. Appeal represents how exciting your zoo is, and determines how much money you get to spend (mainly on building structures for your zoo). Conservation measures how much your efforts are supporting animal preservation; moving along this track gives you access to bonuses such as extra workers and better versions of your action cards. Reputation shows your standing in the scientific community, with more gameplay benefits and also access to a wider range of animal cards. Creating synergy with what animals and structures you place, how you lay out your zoo, what partnerships you go after and what conservation projects you support will gain you points on the various tracks, but there's a catch...

The conservation and appeal points are on the opposite ends of a single track, and the trick to getting a good score is to make sure your conservation keeps up with your appeal. The game ends once a player's markers pass each other (meaning that their conservation and appeal values are roughly equal). After this point, all the other players get one final turn, a mad scramble to finish whatever they are trying to do to maximize their scores, and if they find that they've spent too much game time on increasing their appeal and not enough on conservation, they risk ending up with a low (possibly even a negative) score.

It seems like a lot, and as I mentioned, the rule book doesn't explain it very well, but it really is a smooth system of interlocking game mechanisms, and once you've played a few times everything does kind of lock into place. The best thing to keep in mind while playing is that while it looks like an engine-building game, where you're trying to get just the right combination of elements into play, it's actually a race to see who can get their conservation value to pass their appeal value first. So it's best not to focus on waiting for that perfect card, but rather to just do the best you can with what you have in front of you at the moment.

Rating: 4 (out of 5) A really good game that stops just short of being a great one.

• Ark Nova official website
• Ark Nova on BoardGameGeek

Batman Miniature Game: Gotham's tiny reckoning

I won't lie to you, the Batman Miniature Game by Knight Models is not an easy game to get into if you're a North American gamer. The publisher is based in Spain, and has a reputation for being difficult to work with, so you don't see it on many store shelves, or even in many US-based online stores. On top of that, the game is currently in its third edition, with some pretty drastic rules changes between editions, and the game's introductory set is frequently out of print and usually pretty expensive, and the current version of the game relies on the use of a smartphone app that is buggy and incomplete. Now pile on the usual barriers to entry for tabletop miniatures games such as the time it takes to assemble and paint the miniatures and terrain, and it starts to seem like the bridges into Gotham City are barricaded, just as they were in 2012 Batman film The Dark Knight Rises.

The game's rulebook can be downloaded for free from their website, as can all of the cards you need to play (which will also allow you to bypass the aforementioned app), so as long as you have a robust printer and are able to get your hands on some miniatures and terrain, you can play the game, but it's an awful lot of DIY work in this age of self-contained, pre-packaged games like Conan or Mythic Battles: Pantheon.

But, once you get past all that, there is a really interesting game here.

Like most games of this type, each player assembles a force of 7-10 characters. In this case each team consists of a hero, a sidekick, a handful of henchmen such as thugs or policemen, and possibly one or two free agents to round everything out. Forces are generally limited to a particular faction, so Batman can't team up with the Joker, but there are a few neutral characters such as Catwoman who can join anyone's team.

The game is played out over 4 rounds, which doesn't seem like much, but there is quite a bit each character can do on their turn, so the time goes by quickly and the game usually feels finished by the end of round four. At the start of each round, each player chooses four of their characters to assign Audacity markers to. Characters without those markers will only get one action during the round (usually either a move or an attack), but those with Audacity will get three actions: one move, one attack, and one special action, which usually represents a character's unique ability, such as Batman using his grappling hook or Harley Quinn distracting her opponents with clownish antics.

The real meat of the game, and the thing that makes it more than just the usual slugfest, is the Objectives system, enacted in the game by Objective cards in a player's hand, and Suspect tokens on the board. Each player starts the game with a deck of 20 cards which form their objective deck. These cards are what adds story elements to the game, representing goals and maneuvers such as gathering evidence, stealing loot, taking or rescuing hostages, or (especially in the Joker's case) generally causing chaos.

Objective cards frequently interact with Suspect tokens, which represent civilians, loot, bombs, or anything that needs to have a physical presence on the board. During their turn a character can forego an attack to instead interact with a Suspect token, either placing one on the board, removing one of the opponent's, or moving them into strategic positions.

Objective cards are also the way each player scores points in the game, often making combat with the other player's miniatures secondary to fulfilling the conditions a card might call for. A lot of miniatures games have tried to add card-based mechanisms as a way to spice things up, but this is the most integrated and interesting system I've ever seen. The cards are an integral part of the game rather than a tacked-on extra.

My only major complaint about the game (other than how difficult to find and expensive the miniatures are) is that characters tend to have far too many special abilities. This might seem obvious for a super hero game, but I often find it difficult to keep track of the large number of game effects and when they're supposed to resolve, and sometimes trying to figure out how different abilities interact with each other can lead to some head-scratching moments.

While it is pretty complicated and tends to take a long time to play (we've had games go on for five or more hours), the game really does feel like a Batman story unfolding on the table.

Rating: 3 (out of 5) I'm marking it down a point due to the fairly unreasonable barriers to entry, but the game play itself is a solid 4 out of 5.

• Batman Miniature Game official website
• Batman Miniature Game on BoardGameGeek (not very active)
• Batman Miniature Game Facebook group

Blade Runner the Roleplaying Game: too good not to talk about

I don't normally review role playing games here. I do spend a fair amount of time playing them, but I feel that the experience of playing an RPG is so vastly different than that of playing a board or card game that I honestly don't think the two types of games have all that much in common, the fundamental difference being that in a role playing game, the game mechanisms serve the story being told by the players, while in a board game, the story (if there even is one) is secondary to the game mechanisms.

However, Free League's Blade Runner: the Roleplaying Game is just too good not to talk about.

Swedish publisher Free League has a much deserved reputation for high end design and production value, and that is certainly on display here. The rulebook is beautifully designed and illustrated, using entirely original artwork by Martin Grip and Gustaf Ekelund rather than stills from the Blade Runner films, and the starter set comes with a wide variety of maps and other props created to the same high design standard.

The starter set contains an absurd amount of material: a condensed rulebook, four pre-made characters, two sets of engraved dice, a giant poster map of future L. A., a mountain of player handouts, and one of the best-written roleplaying adventures I've ever seen.

The game takes place in the year 2037, roughly midway between the two movies. Players take on the roles of replicant-hunting Blade Runners in a world that has just recently reintroduced a replicant work force and is still wary of them, in spite of assurances that they will obey every command. The starter set gives players two human and two replicant characters to choose from, and drops them into a murder investigation where they will need to interview suspects and witnesses, gather evidence, and make some interesting moral choices along the way.

The game system is a variation on the Year Zero game engine that forms the backbone of most of Free League's games, modified here to focus on gathering clues and pursuing investigations, with short bursts of violent combat that are very evocative of the setting. Dice rolling to accomplish tasks is very straightforward, with a system for rerolling failures that supports dramatic storytelling. One of the game's more interesting features is a card-based system for resolving chases, something other role playing games often struggle with.

 In place of experience points, players are rewarded with promotion points as they uncover vital pieces of the story's puzzle, and also humanity points when they make choices that favor compassion and humanity, or when they interact with important background characters. Characters can get into combat situations and take damage, but more interestingly, they also take on stress, and the game has a whole mechanical system for how they spend their down time, whether it's drinking in the local bar or relaxing at home with a beloved (and most likely artificial) pet.

In addition to the starter set, Free League has published a core rulebook that provides rules allowing players to create their own characters and case files in order to continue the adventure, but honestly, after how excellent the starter set adventure has been, the idea of having to come up with my own material for the game is daunting to say the least. Hopefully they will continue to publish further adventures and maintain the game's current high standard.

Rating: 5 (out of 5) Playing through the starter set adventure has been the most fun I've had with a roleplaying game in quite some time.

• Blade Runner: the Roleplaying Game official website

Unmatched: Now that's an epic duel

“A quick temper will make a fool of you soon enough.” -- Bruce Lee

To the best of my knowledge, there is only one tabletop game that lets you determine the winner in a fight between Bruce Lee and a tyrannosaurus rex. That game is Unmatched, and it deserves your respect.

Unmatched began its life as a Star Wars game called Epic Duels, published in 2002 by Milton Bradley and sold primarily in the toy store market. As a grid-based tactical combat game, Epic Duels was quite a bit more interesting than the usual toy store fare of the time, with players invited to imagine match-ups between characters from across the Star Wars timeline (as it existed in 2002, anyway), and realize those battles with a unique game system using miniatures, dice and cards. It was an interesting little game, especially by the standards of the time, but its nature as a piece of mass market movie tie-in merchandise meant that it didn't stay in print for long.

Robin Hood fights off a pack of hungry velociraptors

Fast forward to 2019. The core structure of Epic Duels has been revised, refined, and freed from the chains of the Star Wars license. Each player takes control of a character drawn from a wide range of mythology, literature, and popular culture, featuring everything from the aforementioned Bruce Lee to King Arthur, Sherlock Holmes, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, the velociraptors from Jurassic Park, and even a selection from the more obscure side of the Marvel comics universe such as Moon Knight and Ghost Rider. The game then uses miniature movement and card play to imagine a duel between whatever unlikely combination of characters have been chosen.

Most games of this type such as Heroclix or Firefly Adventures use a reasonably large board or map printed with a grid to determine movement and distance. Unmatched instead employs a small board illustrated with a series of connected, color-coded circles to establish each character's position. Miniatures can move along the connections between circles, and the circle's color indicates areas where ranged attacks can be made, eliminating the pesky line-of-sight arguments that are the bane of most miniatures games' existence.

Character actions are determined by a deck of cards, unique to each character. Cards represent attacks, defenses and special abilities that can be employed throughout the game. When combat ensues, the attacker plays an attack card with a numerical value face down on the table, then the defender plays a defense card, also face down. Both cards are revealed simultaneously, and the defender takes damage equal to the difference between attack and defense. Most of the cards have an effect that takes place either before or after the attack, which spices up the game and gives players a lot of tactical options to consider, both when attacking and defending. Damage is tracked using a simple dial. It's a wonderfully elegant system that handles attack and damage in one play, and eliminates the egregious "luck factor" of dice rolling.

Apart from the simple yet elegant game play, each Unmatched set is a class act from start to finish. The game is sold in stand-alone sets of 2, 3 or 4 characters, which allows players to try out the game with minimal investment, and also to stick to only the characters that they find interesting. Are you a Marvel fan with no interest in Little Red Riding Hood or Bigfoot? No problem, Unmatched has you covered. The boxes all come with a high quality plastic tray for all the components (a rarity these days), and while the cards are plenty durable, the trays will even accomodate sleeved cards. The miniatures don't come pre-painted, but they do come with a wash applied that brings out the details of the figure, and also a colored ring for the base that makes it easy to tell each player's characters apart.

The artwork on the cards is all original (even for the characters from licensed properties) and consistently excellent, and the graphic design is slick, contemporary and (most importantly) easy to read. The rulebook is well organized (also a rarity these days), but honestly, once you have the basics down you will rarely need to look at the rules -- the game design really is that good.

Ghost Rider artwork from the "Marvel: Redemption Row" set.

Rating: 5 (out of 5) Not just a great dueling game, but a great card game and a great miniatures game all rolled into one.

• Unmatched official website
• Unmatched on BoardGameGeek